VIEWPOINT | The state of tribal relations - past, present and future

Guest column by Rep. Tamara St. John

As a state legislator representing a tribal community, I’m often asked about state-tribal matters. My affiliation as an enrolled member of the Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate informs my work in historic preservation and tribal archives, which often involves collaboration with tribal, state, and federal entities. This background offers a unique vantage point, enhancing my understanding of both commonalities and distinctions across the various governments.

For example, tribal politics often mirror state politics in several aspects. Similar political factions exist, and criticisms faced by tribal governments parallel those of state governments, ranging from staunch support all the way to accusations of misconduct. It’s crucial to acknowledge these parallels when forming opinions on issues concerning any of the nine tribes.

However, it’s equally important to recognize the significant differences among tribes, akin to variations between states like South Dakota and Minnesota. A one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t work here, which is why making broad comments or accusations directed at all tribes can be problematic. Each tribe stands as a distinct entity responsible for its own financial accountability, public safety strategies, and law enforcement.

VIEWPOINT: The Wild West — Judges, scandal, a foiled assassination and murder