While looking up meanings using my 1953 Funk and Wagnalls and the online Webster's Dictionary on Nihilism and collusion, I came about the following definitions.
Military already vote absentee. As far as full time RVers are concerned, SD Farm Girl has it right. Those of us who live here full time have to live with the consequences of our vote, nomads don’t.
There are about 11 different types of primaries in the US, with California and Washington most closely representing what is proposed by Amendment H. So, in fact, that would make us like those two states.
We already have a form of open primary. If you're unhappy about your voting options in SD, you can change your party affiliation to vote for a candidate and then change it back after you vote so you won't have to explain yourself to friends and family. It's an easy process, at least for those of us who reside here and have to live with the consequences of our votes.
There is certainly a mix of types of primaries in the US--for example, Nebraska’s unicameral legislature uses nonpartisan elections that closely resemble a top-two primary system. It uses open primaries for all other state offices. Clearly there are a number of ways to choose who will represent us, some want only the members of political parties to choose candidates and they argue it's simple, just join the party and vote--the reality is that this means a small number of party faithful select who will be the ordained candidate, I think 17% of eligible Republican voters in the last primary, not sure about Democrats. I would also respectfully disagree that RVers and other nomads don't have to live with the consequences of their vote. Not all policy decisions directly affect them--eliminating a tax on groceries for example, and maybe nomads don't care one way or another and won't vote in an open primary and don't vote in elections either, but other decisions do affect them and I'm guessing some of those folks would like to have their vote counted. The question of whether nomads should be able to become SD residents is another question. Obviously, both parties oppose an open, top two, primary because they lose their control over the selection. Will different candidates be selected if all eligible votes can vote--will less extreme candidates, be they Democrat or Republican, emerge? Time will tell--do we listen to the fear mongers, or do we allow all South Dakotans to vote in the primary regardless of affiliations.
No one in SD is disenfranchised. Everyone can vote. It is particularly silly to claim RVers and Truckers can't vote, that assertation doesn't even make sense - they can vote early or absentee. Open Primaries is an entirely different issue.
SD Bill SD 139 limits the voting rights of citizens who use a mail service. Governor Noem signed bill SD 139 7-1-23. The SD 139 bill also puts an encumbrance on people who want to register. According to the Bill SD 139 I an d others, not only Nomads, are disenfranchised.
I have drivers who are in the road 50 weeks a year. That shipping clerk at the packing house could give zero fucks as to wether that driver makes it home to vote. The fact that you are talking about this like you actually have any kind of real world or statistical data to put behind it is evidence enough that you are parroting talking points. Stop being a chud.
I have been a truck driver for 34 years. Yes you only care about profit! I was a receiver for 8 years and dealt with Over the Road Trucker day and night depending which shift I worked. The Truckers cared about their country and the life style trucking gave them. They wanted the best for their families and themselves. Everyone cared about how the politicians tried to ruin the lively hood they enjoyed. So yes I live in the real world. Thank You for your comment!
I've had drivers miss voting, miss funerals, miss babies being born, miss chemo and radiation treatments...it is the part of the industry that I hate the most. If you had a fair opportunity to vote, maybe you could be better represented. The fact that some.drivers are basically transient while performing a job that is critical to our infrastructure should be afforded reasonable accommodations to cast your vote in elections.
IF your drivers missed their opportunity to vote, that is on them. They screwed up. They need t request absentee ballot knowing they willbe out of the "State" during the Election.
No this involves the 25% of registered independent voters in SD getting to vote in primaries for the person they see fit. The Democrats allow independents to vote in the primaries. Why can't an independent produce a candidate that all parties might vote for who is not tied into the old system of followers instead of doers? Let's cross over that bridge into the 21st Century! Thank You for your comments!
Please read my post below. I go more into detail about the difference between Domicile versus Residency. To better understand the difference, one must look deeper into the definitions of "status person". Your drivers" are domiciled under a "political state" named South Dakota. The jurisdictional boundaries extend past the physical boundaries of a state. IF your drivers refer to themselves as a American Citizen of South Dakota, a free republic, they place their "status" under that political state. They would have to request an absentee ballot during the allotted time they are to be sent out, and delivered back to their home location. IF your drivers are found to have voted in one or more states, then South Dakota can sue the other state(s) to resolve a controversy. For more, read my "Post" below.
Gosh I was stationed in Germany for 31 months when I was first able to vote in 1964. I didn’t have any trouble requesting an absentee ballot and that was at a time when I had to pay $104 for the only phone call home during that 31 months.
The thing that I would like to see changed is the inordinate number of petition signatures needed for independent candidates to make the ballot. It is more than double the amount needed for the two major political parties.
Your Domicile is not necessarily the place, or location you actually reside, it is the "political state" to which you place your legal status in. A legal person is a human or non-human entity that is treated as a person for legal purposes. Legal persons have many of the same rights and responsibilities as a natural person, including the ability to: sue and be sued, own property, and enter into contracts. You attach this 'legal person' to the "State" to which becomes the holder of all lawful documents, property, and holds jurisdiction over such things until one removes or transfers out of such jurisdiction.
Here, we must define the term "State", a "state" is - the revival of Roman law in 14th-century Europe, the term came to refer to the legal standing of persons (such as the various "estates of the realm" – noble, common, and clerical), and in particular the special status of the king. The highest estates, generally those with the most wealth and social rank, were those that held power. Those "persons" that bind themselves to the state. Therefore, a state is a political entity that regulates society and the population within a territory. Government is considered to form the fundamental apparatus of contemporary states. Members of the "State" (status persons) include the governor, Lt. Governor, Treasurer, Auditor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Public Lands and School Commissioner, Public Utilities Commissioner, State Legislators, Supreme Court Justices, Circuit Court Judges, County Commissions, Sheriffs, Auditors, Treasurers, District Attorney, Public Defender, Coroner, Township Boards, Clerks, Secretaries, Constables, County and Precinct Committeemen and Women, and finally the "Qualified Voters". These are all "Legal Status Persons" of a "State"
The day you become a Qualified Voter of the State, taking an oath to, a vow, and finally, subjecting yourself to all statutes, codes, and rules. And here, you must go through the process of fully 'domiciling' yourself to be a part of this political estate, or class of people, as an American Citizen of a 'political state'.
A Citizen is defined as:
a person who has a legal status that gives them the right to live in a state and be protected by its government
entitled to the state's rights and privileges, such as voting, education, healthcare, taxes, and welfare;
can be granted at birth, through naturalization, or by nationality of one or both parents;
may also be determined by where a child is born, such as on a vessel in US territorial waters or on the high seas
The law of the high seas is the set of rules that govern the use of the high seas, which are the parts of the ocean that are not under the jurisdiction of any country, and extends beyond the boundaries of any country (or state) as it relates to the administrative state, to which we live in today. It does not matter what state you live in, if you are a Qualified Voter of South Dakota, you are only bound to this State. If we discover you broke that vow, you can be held accountable to those broken oaths such as voting in more than one state...
Regardless of where you are born in America, you are considered "born" in a large estate, an expanded territorial land area called America as per the treaties agreed to. By your 18th Birthday, you begin the process of domiciling yourself to be part of, or attached to a specific 'political state' as defined by the Union of States. You typically do this by submitting your 'natural birth' document given to your parents by a publicly recorded hospital - to the "state" to which you wish to plant your legal status in. In return, the "political state" gives to you a certificate of birth, thus creating your legal status under the state itself. This document allows for the "state" to hold all jurisdictional control over the status, in terms of person, property rights, taxes, rules of engagement, voting.
Because of this, a person has within the first 24 hours to provide to the "State' legal evidence that you were born, or resided within the jurisdiction of the political state. You do this by your Live Birth Document, an invoice from a campground, hotel, motel, a signed lease agreement, to which provides to the political state, proof, you have begun to establish your domicile.
You do not legally, under the laws of the political state, have to reside in the state during the year, for purposes of serving in the military, to employment, to medical purposes, to family obligations, etc, one can reside 365 days a year in another State, Territory, or Military Base. However, the legal status of your person, always is held, and controlled by the political state of record.
The Jurisdiction of this "Political State" extends past the natural, physical borders of your actual "State", for jurisdiction is defined as a power, or right, or authority to interpret and apply the law; authority of a sovereign power to govern or legislate; to which gives power or right to exercise authority or control under the limits or territory within which authority may be exercised, that has the right, power, or authority to administer justice by hearing and determining controversie.
For any person, to whom has gone through the process of domiciling themselves under the "Political State" called South Dakota, to whom became a "Qualified Voter" at any point during the year, given they had done so prior to the deadline, 15 days before any such state or local election, shall be from that point forward, be 'governed' under the jurisdiction of the "political state" itself. And it shall be unlawful for this legal person to be held on more than one "State Voter Registry" at one time, and where evidence is found that this person has not been removed from another registry, this person's ballot can then be disqualified from being counted.
Therefore, I have called out our County Auditors, saying, they should stop attacking American Citizens who domicile themselves in South Dakota, while living outside the State, and start doing their jobs period. The Supreme Court ruled that ALL Americans can become a Qualified Voter in Your State despite residing in one of the other 49 States. What the State cannot do is restrict a "person" to a specific restriction of days.
I call upon the County Auditors to do their job of Fully Investigating, Auditing, and Reviewing our Domicile Records to make sure they are updated, our Master Voter Registration File to ensure only domiciled citizens are voting in S.D and not on any 'foreign-state list", and they must ensure that the Absentee Ballots only only ending up in the hands of "Domiciled Citizens", to which controversies can be found between two states, or groups of states. This then allows for the Secretary of State to move forward, providing evidence to the Attorney General, to whom can begin a legal suit against specific state (or states) to which the controversy exists.
Domicile is not defined by residency, but by the place or location to which a legal status person has attached himself, herself to, to be governed by a political state, and the laws that govern such.
We should be, as a free group of people, a "State", be comparing our Master Voter File in relation to Other State voter files where two, or more states have common residents.
I am getting information from so CRO’s of insurance companies on why premiums are high. One is reinsurance has gone up substantially because it is spread nationwide over every policy holder for all the losses from hurricanes and fires over last couple of years. Even California is allowing a portion of reinsurance to be charged to the policy holder. I will add more after I speak with other Chief Risk Officers of a few companies.
Military already vote absentee. As far as full time RVers are concerned, SD Farm Girl has it right. Those of us who live here full time have to live with the consequences of our vote, nomads don’t.
There are about 11 different types of primaries in the US, with California and Washington most closely representing what is proposed by Amendment H. So, in fact, that would make us like those two states.
We already have a form of open primary. If you're unhappy about your voting options in SD, you can change your party affiliation to vote for a candidate and then change it back after you vote so you won't have to explain yourself to friends and family. It's an easy process, at least for those of us who reside here and have to live with the consequences of our votes.
Nihilism?
That's what a jungle primary system would lead to. Candidates that stand for nothing but whatever the Donor Class is interested in.
Look, we know the biggest bankers in SD are pushing this destruction.
Nice try though.
Pretty effective propaganda!
There is certainly a mix of types of primaries in the US--for example, Nebraska’s unicameral legislature uses nonpartisan elections that closely resemble a top-two primary system. It uses open primaries for all other state offices. Clearly there are a number of ways to choose who will represent us, some want only the members of political parties to choose candidates and they argue it's simple, just join the party and vote--the reality is that this means a small number of party faithful select who will be the ordained candidate, I think 17% of eligible Republican voters in the last primary, not sure about Democrats. I would also respectfully disagree that RVers and other nomads don't have to live with the consequences of their vote. Not all policy decisions directly affect them--eliminating a tax on groceries for example, and maybe nomads don't care one way or another and won't vote in an open primary and don't vote in elections either, but other decisions do affect them and I'm guessing some of those folks would like to have their vote counted. The question of whether nomads should be able to become SD residents is another question. Obviously, both parties oppose an open, top two, primary because they lose their control over the selection. Will different candidates be selected if all eligible votes can vote--will less extreme candidates, be they Democrat or Republican, emerge? Time will tell--do we listen to the fear mongers, or do we allow all South Dakotans to vote in the primary regardless of affiliations.
No one in SD is disenfranchised. Everyone can vote. It is particularly silly to claim RVers and Truckers can't vote, that assertation doesn't even make sense - they can vote early or absentee. Open Primaries is an entirely different issue.
Dude is confused.
SD Bill SD 139 limits the voting rights of citizens who use a mail service. Governor Noem signed bill SD 139 7-1-23. The SD 139 bill also puts an encumbrance on people who want to register. According to the Bill SD 139 I an d others, not only Nomads, are disenfranchised.
Enough with this nonsense. People who do not live in South Dakota can't vote here.
And in any case, Open Primaries are an entirely different issue.
I have drivers who are in the road 50 weeks a year. That shipping clerk at the packing house could give zero fucks as to wether that driver makes it home to vote. The fact that you are talking about this like you actually have any kind of real world or statistical data to put behind it is evidence enough that you are parroting talking points. Stop being a chud.
I have been a truck driver for 34 years. Yes you only care about profit! I was a receiver for 8 years and dealt with Over the Road Trucker day and night depending which shift I worked. The Truckers cared about their country and the life style trucking gave them. They wanted the best for their families and themselves. Everyone cared about how the politicians tried to ruin the lively hood they enjoyed. So yes I live in the real world. Thank You for your comment!
I've had drivers miss voting, miss funerals, miss babies being born, miss chemo and radiation treatments...it is the part of the industry that I hate the most. If you had a fair opportunity to vote, maybe you could be better represented. The fact that some.drivers are basically transient while performing a job that is critical to our infrastructure should be afforded reasonable accommodations to cast your vote in elections.
IF your drivers missed their opportunity to vote, that is on them. They screwed up. They need t request absentee ballot knowing they willbe out of the "State" during the Election.
You are also confused. Open Primaries and absentee voting are entirely separate issues.
No this involves the 25% of registered independent voters in SD getting to vote in primaries for the person they see fit. The Democrats allow independents to vote in the primaries. Why can't an independent produce a candidate that all parties might vote for who is not tied into the old system of followers instead of doers? Let's cross over that bridge into the 21st Century! Thank You for your comments!
Please read my post below. I go more into detail about the difference between Domicile versus Residency. To better understand the difference, one must look deeper into the definitions of "status person". Your drivers" are domiciled under a "political state" named South Dakota. The jurisdictional boundaries extend past the physical boundaries of a state. IF your drivers refer to themselves as a American Citizen of South Dakota, a free republic, they place their "status" under that political state. They would have to request an absentee ballot during the allotted time they are to be sent out, and delivered back to their home location. IF your drivers are found to have voted in one or more states, then South Dakota can sue the other state(s) to resolve a controversy. For more, read my "Post" below.
Gosh I was stationed in Germany for 31 months when I was first able to vote in 1964. I didn’t have any trouble requesting an absentee ballot and that was at a time when I had to pay $104 for the only phone call home during that 31 months.
Thank You for Your service!
The thing that I would like to see changed is the inordinate number of petition signatures needed for independent candidates to make the ballot. It is more than double the amount needed for the two major political parties.
Your Domicile is not necessarily the place, or location you actually reside, it is the "political state" to which you place your legal status in. A legal person is a human or non-human entity that is treated as a person for legal purposes. Legal persons have many of the same rights and responsibilities as a natural person, including the ability to: sue and be sued, own property, and enter into contracts. You attach this 'legal person' to the "State" to which becomes the holder of all lawful documents, property, and holds jurisdiction over such things until one removes or transfers out of such jurisdiction.
Here, we must define the term "State", a "state" is - the revival of Roman law in 14th-century Europe, the term came to refer to the legal standing of persons (such as the various "estates of the realm" – noble, common, and clerical), and in particular the special status of the king. The highest estates, generally those with the most wealth and social rank, were those that held power. Those "persons" that bind themselves to the state. Therefore, a state is a political entity that regulates society and the population within a territory. Government is considered to form the fundamental apparatus of contemporary states. Members of the "State" (status persons) include the governor, Lt. Governor, Treasurer, Auditor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Public Lands and School Commissioner, Public Utilities Commissioner, State Legislators, Supreme Court Justices, Circuit Court Judges, County Commissions, Sheriffs, Auditors, Treasurers, District Attorney, Public Defender, Coroner, Township Boards, Clerks, Secretaries, Constables, County and Precinct Committeemen and Women, and finally the "Qualified Voters". These are all "Legal Status Persons" of a "State"
The day you become a Qualified Voter of the State, taking an oath to, a vow, and finally, subjecting yourself to all statutes, codes, and rules. And here, you must go through the process of fully 'domiciling' yourself to be a part of this political estate, or class of people, as an American Citizen of a 'political state'.
A Citizen is defined as:
a person who has a legal status that gives them the right to live in a state and be protected by its government
entitled to the state's rights and privileges, such as voting, education, healthcare, taxes, and welfare;
can be granted at birth, through naturalization, or by nationality of one or both parents;
may also be determined by where a child is born, such as on a vessel in US territorial waters or on the high seas
The law of the high seas is the set of rules that govern the use of the high seas, which are the parts of the ocean that are not under the jurisdiction of any country, and extends beyond the boundaries of any country (or state) as it relates to the administrative state, to which we live in today. It does not matter what state you live in, if you are a Qualified Voter of South Dakota, you are only bound to this State. If we discover you broke that vow, you can be held accountable to those broken oaths such as voting in more than one state...
Regardless of where you are born in America, you are considered "born" in a large estate, an expanded territorial land area called America as per the treaties agreed to. By your 18th Birthday, you begin the process of domiciling yourself to be part of, or attached to a specific 'political state' as defined by the Union of States. You typically do this by submitting your 'natural birth' document given to your parents by a publicly recorded hospital - to the "state" to which you wish to plant your legal status in. In return, the "political state" gives to you a certificate of birth, thus creating your legal status under the state itself. This document allows for the "state" to hold all jurisdictional control over the status, in terms of person, property rights, taxes, rules of engagement, voting.
Because of this, a person has within the first 24 hours to provide to the "State' legal evidence that you were born, or resided within the jurisdiction of the political state. You do this by your Live Birth Document, an invoice from a campground, hotel, motel, a signed lease agreement, to which provides to the political state, proof, you have begun to establish your domicile.
You do not legally, under the laws of the political state, have to reside in the state during the year, for purposes of serving in the military, to employment, to medical purposes, to family obligations, etc, one can reside 365 days a year in another State, Territory, or Military Base. However, the legal status of your person, always is held, and controlled by the political state of record.
The Jurisdiction of this "Political State" extends past the natural, physical borders of your actual "State", for jurisdiction is defined as a power, or right, or authority to interpret and apply the law; authority of a sovereign power to govern or legislate; to which gives power or right to exercise authority or control under the limits or territory within which authority may be exercised, that has the right, power, or authority to administer justice by hearing and determining controversie.
For any person, to whom has gone through the process of domiciling themselves under the "Political State" called South Dakota, to whom became a "Qualified Voter" at any point during the year, given they had done so prior to the deadline, 15 days before any such state or local election, shall be from that point forward, be 'governed' under the jurisdiction of the "political state" itself. And it shall be unlawful for this legal person to be held on more than one "State Voter Registry" at one time, and where evidence is found that this person has not been removed from another registry, this person's ballot can then be disqualified from being counted.
Therefore, I have called out our County Auditors, saying, they should stop attacking American Citizens who domicile themselves in South Dakota, while living outside the State, and start doing their jobs period. The Supreme Court ruled that ALL Americans can become a Qualified Voter in Your State despite residing in one of the other 49 States. What the State cannot do is restrict a "person" to a specific restriction of days.
I call upon the County Auditors to do their job of Fully Investigating, Auditing, and Reviewing our Domicile Records to make sure they are updated, our Master Voter Registration File to ensure only domiciled citizens are voting in S.D and not on any 'foreign-state list", and they must ensure that the Absentee Ballots only only ending up in the hands of "Domiciled Citizens", to which controversies can be found between two states, or groups of states. This then allows for the Secretary of State to move forward, providing evidence to the Attorney General, to whom can begin a legal suit against specific state (or states) to which the controversy exists.
Domicile is not defined by residency, but by the place or location to which a legal status person has attached himself, herself to, to be governed by a political state, and the laws that govern such.
We should be, as a free group of people, a "State", be comparing our Master Voter File in relation to Other State voter files where two, or more states have common residents.
Thank You! Enjoyed reading your comment and putting the time into helping us understand.
I am getting information from so CRO’s of insurance companies on why premiums are high. One is reinsurance has gone up substantially because it is spread nationwide over every policy holder for all the losses from hurricanes and fires over last couple of years. Even California is allowing a portion of reinsurance to be charged to the policy holder. I will add more after I speak with other Chief Risk Officers of a few companies.